Can you imagine a football game which came from an amalgamation of Australian Football and Rugby League?
Well it was on the cards. Not once, but twice such a proposal was considered last century.
The first was in 1914 when a conference was held by high level officials of both codes in Sydney during the national all-states carnival in August.
Despite calls that such a move would simply be stupid and a waste of time, many took the proposal very seriously. So serious that a series of conferences were held.
From what we can discern, it was the brainchild of Charles Brownlow, the long term Geelong Football Club secretary and delegate to the VFL at the time. He was also their delegate to the Australian National Football Council (ANFC) which first promoted this idea of amalgamation.
Apparently his reasoning was the perceived failure of the 1914 Carnival in Sydney, noting that thousands had attended games by the Australian Rugby League team against the English touring side only weeks before at the SCG. These matches had drawn 38,000 & 41,000 spectators respectively and a further 40,000 at the Sydney Showground during the same period.
He argued that if Rugby League could draw crowds of that nature and games of Australian Football could do the same in Melbourne and to some extent, Adelaide, why not introduce a combined game which could appease everyone? Some commentators even went as far as identifying the thousands of pounds in gate money the Football Council could derive.
Then followed an additional conference of delegates held in Melbourne in November of the same year. The attendees decided not to release any details of the meeting until a further date. Mr. H. (Horrie) R. Miller, secretary of the N.S.W. Rugby League, said that “the day decided on for giving out the news was Thursday, Nov. 19,” the day following the next meeting of his League. But added “I can say this, the result of the conference is far beyond our most sanguine expectations. This will be agreeable news to many, surprising news to many, who look upon the movement as Utopian. However, it is a wonderful world, and we shall see.”
Later that month, after considering the proposals for a new code of rules, by the amalgamation of the Rugby League and Australian game, the New South Wales Rugby League said it was favourable to a change. So, if the Australian Football bodies in the various States were also in favour, the new game would be adopted, and it was thought that matches could be played in 1915 as ‘curtain raisers’ to the competition engagements.
Discussion over the summer months leading into 1915 as to whether Australian Football, should agree to change their rules in order to come up with a hybrid game. By early February it was announced that the NSW Rugby League and the South Australian National Football League agreed to an amalgamation of codes.
Alex McCracken, president of the VFL told the media that conference delegates had tentatively agreed to certain proposals which were being submitted to the various state leagues for a decision. At the same time, the NSW (Australian) Football League unanimously agreed to the following alterations:
1. A crossbar between the goal posts, 10ft (183cm) from the ground. The ball to be kicked over the bar to constitute a goal; a ball going under the bar to count as a behind; the behind posts to be retained, and behinds scored as at present.
2. Throwing or knocking the ball backwards, that is, the player in possession of the ball who knocks or throws the ball, must always be between such ball and the goal towards which he is kicking.
3. When a player in possession of the ball is collared, he may be thrown or pushed aside, even though he drops the ball immediately he is caught. The tackle in such instances will permit a player to catch an opponent between the hips and the shoulders. Unless a deliberate foul occurs, no penalty shall be allowed for such tackle.
It appeared though, as far Victoria was concerned there was no likelihood of any drastic alterations to the rules of their game. However, it was considered one or two amendments could be made. Speaking at the Carlton FC annual meeting in late January, Mr. McCracken said ˜they would be very careful about making any change in the game which they all liked,” with several in the audience interjecting, ‘Carlton won’t have it.’ Mr. Gardiner, a Carlton delegate at the VFL meeting, said “it was waste of time discussing it.”
The VFL said at a special meeting that it had decided to defer consideration of the matter until additional information was in hand.
At its mid-April meeting, the VFL decided to report the decision of the League to the Australasian Football Council. During the discussion the whole of the arguments were directed towards showing that the alterations proposed would improve the Australian game. Each dealt with a point discussed long before the proposed amalgamation of the codes was ever mentioned.
In reading the reports, I don’t think the VFL clubs were ever serious about any change.
By 12 May not all states had replied to the Australian National Football Council’s request for a decision on amalgamation of codes.
With further pressure of the Great War impinging on society throughout the country, the whole subject seemed to just peter out.
The attached image shows a suggested field placements for an amalgamated game.
In our next article we will explore the 1933 attempt at amalgamating the codes. This time there were proper rules and other details drawn up for implementation.